Home

  • Satta Matta Matka Games के प्रकार

    90 के दशक के बाद सट्टा मटका (सटका मटका) खेल की लोकप्रियता कम होने के कारण क्या है ?
    इस खेल की लोकप्रियता कम होने के कारणों में से एक कारण है लोगों के पास सट्टा मटका (सटका मटका) खेल खेलने के अलावा कई विकल्प मौजूद थे। जहाँ वो पैसे लगा कर अच्छा मुनाफा कमा सकते थे। अन्य जगहों पर लगने वाला समय सट्टा मटका (सटका मटका) की तुलना में कम होता है।

    कम समय में ज्यादा मुनाफा कराने वाले खेलों की तुलना में सट्टा मटका (सटका मटका) अपनी लोकप्रियता खोता गया। सट्टा मटका (सटका मटका) खेल की लोकप्रियता कम होने का एक कारण भी यह था कि इस खेल को भारतीय समाज के लोगों के द्वारा एक बुरी आदत माना जाता था।

    इसीलिए यह कानूनी रूप से सही व सुरक्षित खेल नहीं था। इसका अर्थ है कि यह खेल भारत में प्रतिबंधित और अवैध है। कोई भी व्यक्ति सरेआम सट्टा मटका (सटका मटका) नहीं खेल सकता है। क्योंकि भारत सरकार और नियम इस खेल को खेलने की इजाज़त नहीं देती है।

    Satta Matta Matka के Games बहुत ज्यादा प्रकार के होते हैं. इनका नाम इसलिए भिन्न होता है एक दुसरे से क्यूंकि इन्हें स्थान के हिसाब से रखा जाता है. जैसे Satta king desawar गेम उस स्थान के हिसाब से रखा गया है.

    चलिए इस हिसाब से दुसरे Satta King Games के बारे में जानते हैं जैसे – कल्याण मटका, कुबेर मटका, मैन मुंबई मटका, दी पी बॉस, इंडियन मटका, वाली मटका, सुपर डे मटका, बॉस मटका, कुबेर मटका, मधुर मटका, ब्लैक सट्टा, गली दिसावर, गुरु दिल्ली, मायापुरी, दिल्ली किंग, मुंबई मॉर्निंग,  इत्यादि.

    Satta Matta Matka New Site 2020
     यह लेख केवल सूचनात्मक उद्देश्य के लिए है, हम सट्टा मटका या किसी भी प्रकार की जुआ गतिविधियों का समर्थन नहीं करते हैं। यदि आपको यहां प्रदर्शित सामग्री से कोई समस्या है, तो हमसे संपर्क करने में संकोच न करें।

    सट्टा मटका (सटका मटका) खेल का परिणाम : play bazaar
    अगर कोई व्यक्ति इस खेल के संचालन में लिप्त पाया जाता है, तो उस व्यक्ति पर इससे जुड़ी कार्रवाई की जाती है। इसको सट्टे का ही एक प्रकार माना जाता है। “सट्टेबाजी” एक तरह से ऐसा खेल है। जहाँ पर सिर्फ दो चीज़ें ही मुमकिन है।

    या तो आप इस खेल को जीत जाते है। या फिर आप अपना लगाया हुआ सारा पैसा इस खेल को हार कर खो देते हैं। सट्टा मटका (सटका मटका) खेल को आमतौर पर किस्मत के खेल के रूप में जाना जाता है।

    यह बात एक हद तक सही भी है। लेकिन एक खिलाड़ी पुराने आंकड़ों का अच्छे तरीके से अध्ययन करके आगे आने वाले नम्बरो का पता कर सकता है।

    एक व्यक्ति के लिए गणित की अच्छी समझ और उसके सोचने की क्षमता उसके लिए सट्टा मटका (सटका मटका) खेल में वरदान साबित हो सकती है।

    इस खेल को जीतने के लिए और बड़ी रकम हासिल करने के लिए खिलाड़ी को निश्चित रूप से उसके पक्ष में एक बहुत ही अच्छी किस्मत की आवश्यकता होगी।

    लेकिन आपको पता होना चाहिए कि सट्टा मटका (सटका मटका)  केवल अकेले भाग्य का खेल नहीं है और भाग्य उसको सटका मटका खेल में बड़ा मुनाफा जीता दे।

    लेकिन ऐसा नहीं होता है। बल्कि इसके लिए व्यक्ति को अपने दिमाग की भी उतनी ही अधिक आवश्यकता होगी जितनी की भाग्य की।

    खिलाड़ी अगर पहले से सभी पूर्व के सारे परिणाम देख कर आगामी रुझानों की संख्या को तय करने में इस्तेमाल कर सकता है। एक व्यक्ति को सट्टा मटका (सटका मटका) खेल में जीतने के लिए अपनी बुद्धि का उपयोग करना अनिवार्य है।

  • how to play satta matka

    Satta Matka is played online nowadays. You can get money through an agent. But money is not just thrown with an arrow in the air. You should have a good understanding related to Satta Matka and numbers, only then you can make profit in the game of Satta Matka.

    If you want to know how to play Satta Matka, then keep reading this article. You will be given complete information related to Satki Matki game.

    How to play Satta Matka? Before this, understand the basics of Satta Matka. In this game, if someone tells you that you will get 4 out of 1, it means that you will be given 400 rupees out of 100. You can get up to 100 times in Satta Matka. Maybe this is the reason why people are more attracted towards it. Let us tell you that we are writing this post for information purpose only. We do not promote this game. This game is an illegal game.

    सट्टा मटका ( सटकी मटकी ) Betting Time
    नंबरों के बारे में समझने के बाद आपको समझना होगा कि जिस मटके के अंतर्गत आप सट्टा लगा रहे हैं उसका ओपन और क्लोज टाइम क्या है। अर्थात play bazaar कब सत्ता शुरू होता है और कब क्लोज होकर उसका रिजल्ट बताया जाता है। भारत में कई ऑनलाइन वेबसाइट एवं एप्पलीकेशन है जो सटकी मटकी खिलवाते है।

    After understanding about the numbers, you have to understand that what is the open and close time of the pot under which you are betting. That is, when the power starts and when it closes, its result is told. There are many online websites and applications in India that provide potted pots.

    सट्टा मटका जीत एवं हार
    नम्बर और ओपन तथा क्लोज टाइम समझने के बाद कब खिलाड़ी गेम खेलने के लिए तैयार हो जाता है तो खिलाड़ी पहले मटका ओपन के समय शर्त लगा देता है। इसके बाद मटका क्लोज के टाइम अंको की घोषणा के बाद आपको यह पता चल जाता है कि कौन जीता एवं कौन हारा।

    1. ऑफलाइन माध्यम से
    डिजिटलीकरण तथा कानूनी दांव पेंच से बचने के लिए अब अधिकतर सट्टा मटका ऑनलाइन की ओर रुख कर चुके है लेकिन कई मटके आज भी ऑफलाइन चलते हैं जिनमें वे लोगों को सट्टा खिलवाते हैं। आपको बता दें कि सट्टा की शुरुआत मुम्बई से हुई थी इसीलिए ऑफलाइन या ऑनलाइन दोनों तरह के सट्टा मार्किट का केंद्र मुंबई है। ऑफलाइन Satta Matka में 1 से लेकर 99 तक के नंबर चुने जाते हैं। इसके बाद आपको रकम अदा करनी होती है। आपका एजेंट आपके चयनित नम्बर का टिकट देगा। यदि आपका नम्बर फसता है तो आपको विजेता माना जायेगा।

    2. ऑनलाइन माध्यम से
    बढ़ते डिजिटलीकरण के कारण सब कुछ ऑनलाइन आज्ञा तो सट्टा मार्किट भी इससे अछूता नहीं रहा है। मटका से जुड़े कई ऐजेंट ऐसे हैं जिन्होंने खुद की वेबसाइट और एप्लीकेशन का निर्माण करके ऑनलाइन मटका खिलाते हैं। ऑनलाइन मटका में एजेंट की वेबसाइट पर जाकर आपको भुगतान करना होगा और अपना नंबर का चयन करना होगा।

    सट्टा मटका खेलने के फायदे एवं नुकसान
    सट्टा मटका एक जुआ है जिसको खेलकर आपको सामाजिक एवं आर्थिक दोनों रूप से नुकसान उठाना पड़ सकता है। आप ये तक जानते ही होंगे कि जुआ या सट्टा खेलना भारत मे कितने निम्न दर्जे का कार्य होता है। लोग सटोरिये या जुआरी को उतने सम्मान की नजरों से नहीं देखते हैं और उन्हें समाज में उचित दर्जे नहीं दिया जाता है।

    सरकार भी जुआ या किसी भी प्रकार के Satta Matka के खिलाफ़ है। कानूनी रूप से यह अवैद्य है। यदि आप सट्टा खेलते हैं और पुलिस के पकड़ में आते हैं तो आपको जुर्माना और सजा दोनों हो सकती है। इसीलिए हम आपसे निवेदन करते हैं कि आप ऐसे खेलों से दूर रहे जिससे आपकी समाज मे नकारात्मक छवि बने लोग आपके साथ उठने बैठने से कतराए। आगे हमने आपको सट्टा मटका के फायदे एवं नुकसान के बारे में जानकारी दी है।

    Satta Matka Websites and Application
    भारत में सट्टा मटका ऑनलाइन रूप से संचालित किया जाता है। इन वेबसाइट पर संचालक सट्टा मटका पर ऑनलाइन ही पैसा लगवा देते हैं। इसी वेबसाइट पर आपको सटका मटका रिजल्ट भी प्राप्त हो जाता है।

    इस वेबसाइट पर एक मटका नहीं अपितु जितने भी मटके संचालित किए जाते हैं उनकी सारी जानकारी इस मटके पर रहती है। इन वेबसाइट पर मटका कब ओपन होगा, क्लोज होगा मटके का रिजल्ट कब आएगा। एजेंट का कांटेक्ट नम्बर आदि मौजूद रहते हैं। यह एजेंट अपने अनुभव और अंकीय समझ के आधार पर आपको आंकलन करके बताते हैं कि कौन सा नम्बर लग सकता है। इसके एवज में वे आपसे कुछ पैसे लेते हैं जिसका भुगतान आपको ऑनलाइन ही करना होता है।

  • The Germans defend Luca Toni: It’s the Qq Poker OnlineItalians’ fault!

    Luca Toni spent the whole European Championship without netting a goal, but his German fans know that it was down to the Italian’s negative tactics.

    “What did the Italians do to Toni? He doesn’t score, he suffers and complains. Luckily, he shaved that dreadful moustache,” wrote Bild Zeitung in defence of the Bundesliga’s top scorer. “Here at Bayern he receives accurate passes from Ribery and Klose, while for his country he has to retreat in order to receive the ball, which come to him Satta result and wide,” added the top-selling daily.

    Munich Abendzeitung laid the blame on coach Roberto Donadoni. “Teams like Italy that sit and wait for penalties are few and far between.”

    Frankfurter Allgemeine revealed an exchange of text messages between Toni and Klose. The Italian complained to his pal about his “best friend” having betrayed him. Klose asked if he could be of any help. Toni replied, “I mean the ball. It’s my best friend and now we are not at the best of terms.”

    Spain and Portugal agree on joint bid for the 2018 WC

    It is common knowledge that the 2014 World Cup will be played in Brazil, but where will it go next? The bids for the following tournament are being prepared and an irresistible bid is being made by neighbours Spain and Portugal. “If Spain hands its bid for the 2018 World Cup, it will be in alliance with Portugal,” said the Spanish FA president, Ángel María Villar.

    Speaking for Antena 1, the Spanish soccer leader called the idea on the joint bid “brilliant,” praising Portugal as a “excellent partner, who fulfils all the conditions for a joint act.”

    The elaboration of the “brilliant” idea is to follow, because it will have to be approved by both countries’ governments.

    Joao Havelange clams two World Cups were fixed

    Former FIFA president, Brazilian Joao Havelange, sensationally told the Brazilian media that the 1966 and 1974 World Cups, won by hosts England and West Germany, were fixed. Havelange, who took up office only in 1974, said the referees directly influenced the outcomes of the two tournaments. “In three games Brazil played in 1966, seven out of nine referees and linesmen were British, and two Germans, all part of the effort to help England and Germany reach the finals, as the English Sir Stanley Rous (then FIFA’s president) wanted. “The same thing happened 1974 in Germany. Our game against Holland was refereed by a German (Tschentscher) and we lost, while Germany won the Cup (against Holland). Although we had the best team in the world, the same that won the 1970 Cup in Mexico, it was planned beforehand that the home countries should win the titles.

    Rummenigge furious at Real Madrid: Let United tell them ‘no’!

    Bayern’s Executive Committee chairman Karl-Heinz Rummenigge rose against Real Madrid for their unlawful interference with Manchester United’s Cristiano Ronaldo.

    Rummenigge, who is also the chairman of the European Clubs Association, an organization that replaced the infamous elitist G-14, wholeheartedly supports Manchester United in their conflict with Real, who brainwashed Ronaldo into pushing for a transfer to Santiago Bernabeu.

    “The regulations are clear and Manchester United have a clear contract with the player for the next four years. Apart from this, I know Alex Ferguson very well and I know that his refusal is to be taken seriously,” said the German.

    “The player and Real Madrid can reach any sort of agreement, but it’s United who have the last word and if they refuse the offer, there is nothing left to discuss.”

    Madrid’s president Ramón Calderón indicated that he would be ready to play 85-90 million euros for the Portuguese wizard, while Real’s coach Bernd Schuster said that even one hundred million euros would not be too much for such a classy footballer.

    Marcello Lippi: I am very, very happy

    The new-old Italian national team coach, Marcello Lippi, has declared himself overjoyed with his return to the position he abandoned in July 2006.

    “I am very, very, very happy. And very motivated. See you next week,” said Lippi to Gazzetta dello Sport.

    These were his first words after being re-named coach two years after winning the ultimate prize in soccer – the World Cup. Ever since, he has been unemployed. The Italian football federation (FIGC) announced they would make an official presentation next week.

    Beckenbauer slams Podolski: Why don’t you play so well at Bayern?

    Lukas Podolski, the in-form German striker, has continued to baffle his employers at Bayern, where the international delivers only occasionally. One of those who would like to see the brighter side of Podolski a bit more often is Bayern Munich’s president, Franz Beckenbauer.

    “Whenever I hear Podolski complaining about the lack of opportunities and trust by the coaching staff, say that nobody is stopping him from doing just as well here as he does for the national team. With such a form he would certainly be in the starting eleven,” wrote Beckenbauer in his column in Bild.

    “When playing for Bayern, he is frequently inert, while at the Euros his body language says ‘pass me the ball, here I am.’ Podolski and Schweinsteiger have played so well as we have not seen them play at club level since 2006,” concluded the Kaiser.

    “Poldi”, a naturalized Pole, came to Bayern two years ago and has yet to win a starting place, unlike in the national team, where he has been a regular since 2004.

  • taly’s tragic triumph Bandarqqinvevitable?

    Italy sit on the verge of a remarkable triumph amid the most explosive scandal to hit European football for decades.

    In only a few days Juventus could be relegated to Serie C and Milan, Lazio and Fiorentina to Serie B for their roles in trying to arrange referees for Serie A matches.

    The board of the Italian F.A. have all resigned, the national manager has been questioned and former Italy midifielder and still Juve employee Gianluca Pessotto has attempted suicide. Stirring stuff on the eve of the World Cup Final.

    Against this backdrop it seems almost Indian Matka that gli azzurri will lift the trophy, a pyrrhic victory given the domestic game is in shambles.

    The fact the police are banging on the door back home has conversely not upset but inspired Marcello Lippi’s men to perform superbly, no less than in their expert derailing of the host nation in the semi finals with two killer strikes of sublime quality.

    ”I think the scandal will affect the Italy players,” Italian soccer journalist and co-author of Gianluca Vialli’s latest ‘The Italian Job’ Gabriele Marcotti told Soccerphile before the tournament, “but perhaps not in the way you think. First and foremost, the vast majority of them seem to view this as good news, a cleansing of the system, if you will. None of them liked Moggi and even fewer liked GEA, even some GEA clients (the principal player agency implicated).” Italians live amid corruption on a daily basis, so this came as no surprise.

    Paolo Rossi cam back from a ban imposed for match-fixing to be the star of the 1982 World Cup, an important omen for Italy, for whom Fabio Cannavaro and goalie Gianluigi Buffon have performed heroics.

    “With regard to Buffon it’s quite simple,” says Marcotti: “He either did bet AFTER it became illegal to do so (November 2005) or he did not. If he did, it will come out and, I think, he knows that, in which case it will unsettle him. If he did not, and his conscience is clear, he knows he has nothing to fear.

    Cannavaro’s name comes up time and again. The transcripts I saw don’t suggest he did anything wrong, but he seems uncomfortably close to Moggi and I think it could tarnish his image. Certainly, knowing the kind of guy he is, I don’t think he is enjoying the scrutiny: he has done a lot to cultivate a well-deserved reputation as a nice guy.”

    But there are different perceptions at play here and the mega-scandal that was broken by Gazzetta dello Sport may not be viewed back in Italy as badly as it is here. As Marcotti explains:

    The way it will affect Italy is at a political level. It’s the kind of thing some countries (like England) never worry about, but which others (Brazil and Spain first and foremost) are very concerned over.

    With a very weakened federation and no credible people on FIFA’s important committees, there is a fear that Italy will be an after-thought when it comes to assigning referees. As a general rule of thumb, if you’re stronger than you’re opponent, you want one of the better refs, if you’re weaker, you’d rather have a poor ref (who might make a mistake in your favor).

    In 2002, the Italian FA was blamed as much as anyone after we got Byron Moreno in the knockout game against Korea. It was felt they should have done more to get an established official, one who would not make the kind of mistakes that Moreno made.”

    Paul Foot, author of “Calcio – a history of Italian football” rated the azzurri as “favourites or second favourites” before the tournament and I for one doubted him.

    But as he explained, “Italy already has the best defense and goalkeeper in the world and they tend to get stronger as tournaments go on. Totti needs to be fit too as he is crucial but I don’t see any weaknesses in them apart from maybe at right back.”

    When I analysed the draw and the permutations in early June I came up with a final of Brazil v Italy although I would not have said Italy were the second best team in the tournament before the start. If one suspected they had had a favourable draw to begun with and then advanced courtesy of some old style histrionics and an inept referee against Australia, the Italians certainly earned their stripes in the semi final beyond any doubt.

    As Marcotti concluded, “All things said, our record in World Cups is actually very good.” Tonight should see Lippi’s men achieve more stunning glory against a backdrop of criminal disgrace and complete an amazing tableau of the Italian game.

  • Wembley Saga Drags PkvOn

    Today the builders of the new Wembley Stadium admitted it was only 70% likely to be ready in time for its first scheduled event, the FA Cup Final in May 2006.

    It should be noted forthwith that safety for fans is Pkvmore important than anything so another delay is far from the end of the world but this is yet another chapter in the troubled tale that has been the replacing of the old national football ground. There were prolonged and bloody political squabbles over whether to include athletics or not, and anger at the exorbitant cost of purchasing the land, demolishing the old ground and constructing a new one and now matka final today there are regular concerns being voiced over cost overruns and put back completion times. Nothing strange there you might think, as this is often the case with the birth of grands projets, niggles that are soon forgotten once the Colossus is up there looking out over Rhodes’ harbour.

    The English football world is already so jaded by the saga of Wembley’s rebuilding that no one really cares whether the Cup Final will be at Cardiff for another year. In fact, given the positive experiences of fans visiting the Millennium Stadium, an impressive arena located in the heart of a vibrant city a stone’s throw from a mainline railway station, there cannot seriously be many fans dying to return to the grimy industrial estates of the grubby and uninspiring outer suburb of London that is Wembley.

    A Cup Final is about having a day out as well as watching the game itself and a trip to the area surrounding Wembley was nothing if not disappointing, particularly given the chronic lack of hostelries within walking distance of the stadium. I traveled to Wembley several times over the past quarter of a century for football matches and not once did I have an experience as magical as the self-styled ‘Venue of Legends’ would have had us believe. The complex itself sat amidst a sea of concrete and was home to overpriced and unpleasant food & merchandise, rude and ignorant stewarding and above all inadequate sightlines, courtesy of a 1920s athletic stadium stands having seats bolted on to them without thought for views of the football field.

    My abiding memory of the Wembley experience was of sprinting to the stadium just in time for a delayed kick off for an England v Poland World Cup qualifier in 1988 after Wembley plc had forced everyone to collect their match tickets at Wembley Arena in a barmy and never-repeated experiment in ‘efficiency’. As I ran breathless up the multiple flights of stairs to a seat so high up that the roof only just fell short of covering the field in my sightline, England fans stood urinating against the walls of the stairwells as ‘God Save the Queen’ boomed out over the tannoy.

    Even more frustrating than the views and underwhelming experience was the Football Association’s commitment to signing exclusive contracts for England matches with the private company who ran the creaking, smelling dinosaur that was Wembley. While countries like Italy and Germany played their national team games across the country, England, the birthplace of the sport, stayed marooned at what effectively was a neutral ground, which conspicuously failed to replicate the atmosphere English football is famous for.

    When the obsolete old place blessedly closed at long last in October 2000 after 78 years of football and two Olympic Games, England took their home games around the country for the first time in living memory. The experience has been positive all round, especially for fans from the football hotbeds of the North for whom a midweek trip to London is out of the question. But it was a time-limited beano, a tantalizing glimpse of what could have been.

    Now a new Wembley is almost a reality again, and although the projected sightlines on the official website do not appear that much better than those of the old ground, at least there will be plenty of tickets available, 90,000, for casual fans, (or 70,000 after the corporate parasites have had their fill) and the edifice itself looks more impressive than the old, twin towers and all.

    Drive along London’s North Circular Road and the silhouette of a magnificent fortress appears on the horizon ahead, commanding awe from all around and distracting drivers’ attention away from Ikea at Brent Cross. I for one will try to feel hopeful that the 757 million pounds spent on this project will have been worth it and that world-renowned architect Norman Foster has not made another wobbly bridge out of this millennium dream.

    It would be churlish not to feel some optimism about a new home for the England team but how telling it is that such an expensive and apparently magnificent creation has failed so singularly to inspire the nation’s fans, whatever the Wembley PR men might tell you.

  • An Exemplary Indian Matka

    I am back in England after three weeks or so at the World Cup, a pilgrimage I vowed to make every four years for the rest of my life after I met an Irishman in Seoul in 2002 at his tenth finals (I think he was wearing the same tweed jacket back in 1966).

    The first I travelled to was Italia ’90 and compared to that, Germany’s organisation was light years ahead. Germany’s rail network was excellent and Indian Matka although its ICE trains were not quite as fast as France’s TGVs in 1998 or Japan’s Shinkansens (bullet trains) four years ago, they were very frequent and reliable. I found the city transports almost faultless, with the exception of the near fatal crush on Gelsenkirchen’s trams, which appeared to be running a Bank Holiday service before the USA v Czech Republic match.

    Accommodation was readily available although I did fall foul of one of the many establishments that took your money and allowed no cancellations once travel plans changed, as they invariably do for fans in knock-out tournaments.

    The fan fests were great ideas and worked very well, except for the draconian ban on bringing water in despite the searing temperatures, and the hard sell from the sponsors at every opportunity.

    This leads me to another gripe with FIFA.

    Given the indefensible ticketing policy that gave England an official total allocation of 14,700 and a company called Avaya 25,000, and saw dozens of people with “Suche karten” (want tickets) signs in every host city, why did we have to sit there and listen to the stadium announcer at every match triumphantly announce the game was sold out, with the same words in block capitals on the big screens? It was a sell-out all right.

    Throughout I marvelled at the folly of England’s efforts to stage the 2006 World Cup. For a start England’s transport network is some years behind Germany’s, where trams, cycle lanes and double decker trains are the norm, not the rarity. One could argue that England’s stadia are better, though the modern arenas in Munich and Gelsenkirchen are streets ahead of anything the home of football has, until perhaps the new Arsenal and Wembley stadia open.

    I thought the choice of three venues with running tracks, Stuttgart, Nuremburg and Berlin, also meant three venues with subdued atmospheres however renovated the buildings were, and at least England would have hosted the finals with soccer-only arenas. But the ‘smaller’ stadia such as Cologne and Hannover had top drawer atmospheres and superb sightlines. My favourite remained Leipzig, the most spectacular of the venues from the inside and so grand and imposing from outside, with a monumental approach redolent of the 1930s.

    I would question the choice of small and inaccessible Kaiserslautern as a host city although Moenchengladbach might well have replaced it had their stadium renovation plan been in place by the time of the initial bid. One could argue that Derby, a venue touted for an English World Cup bid, has similar shortcomings.

    But I do not wish to moan. The World Cup was at home in a great host nation and was a superb fan experience all things considered.

    The best two things about the decision to give the World Cup to Germany were the amount of space in the country available for visitors and the positive reaction of the host nation’s people. Germany’s cities were so visitor friendly, boasting wide streets, many of them pedestrianised, and extensive beer gardens to make all the fans feel happy and relaxed.

    The Germans were relaxed too. Even when thousands poured into the streets of Berlin or Munich after German victories the atmosphere was hugely celebratory, not aggressively tribal as it would have been in England.

    There were TVs everywhere, even in the river (in Frankfurt) and the fan fests proved they had got it right in welcoming fans with or without tickets (most people saw none).

    Above all it seemed the authorities were welcoming the influx, not worrying about any possible problems that could result. Unofficial merchandise was everywhere and there were no problems finding flags, scarves and shirts with the country of your choice, far cheaper and more attractive than the perenially overpriced and ugly official FIFA souvenirs.

    I remember Euro ’96 as a tournament with unreliable transport connections, police and local authorities afraid of putting up big screens Indian satta because of the public order risk and the centre of London oblivious to the tournament that was taking place on its doorstep. Add to the fact England is a cramped and awkward country where football fervour too often leads to ugly nationalism and you can see why Germany was so much the better choice.

    I salute them for hosting a terrific party where it was hard to see what more the Germans could have done to live up their motto of ‘Die Welt Zu Gast Bei Freunden’ – the world as a guest among friends, or, as they translated it, ‘A Time to Make Friends’.

  • Hello World!

    Welcome to WordPress! This is your first post. Edit or delete it to take the first step in your blogging journey.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started